Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Johnson vs Langford 1909

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by QueensburyRules View Post

    - - , Einstein, per boxrec:
    • The fight was stopped by the police. Burns always claimed he could have continued had the police not intervened. Lightweight boxer later admitted to promoter that he and a pal had crawled under the ring prior to the fourteenth round and shouted for the police to stop the fight. Unholz worked Johnson's corner and had bet a large sum of money on Jack winning.
    • The New York Times reported: "The end came in the fourteenth round when the police, seeing Burns tottering and unable to defend himself from the savage blows of his opponent, mercifully stopped the fight. Previously it had been arranged that if the police interfered a decision would be rendered on points, and referee McIntosh without hesitation declared the big black man the winner
    No proof of that except a fighter trying to be relevant in a historical moment. Every press report AND boxrec say Johnson was destroying him. Of course Burns would try and save face.
    Ivich Ivich likes this.

    Comment


      #32
      [QUOTE=Ivich;n31692600]
      Originally posted by GhostofDempsey View Post
      How did Johnson know the NYAC would not allow the fight ? The promoters, the McMahon brothers didnt and neither did Joe Jeannette? So was Johnson privy to secret information that they werent?lol Johnson went to NY for the fight why, would he do that if he knew it would not take place?

      How did Johnson become the world's champion at Reno when he had won the title 2 years previously in Sydney Australia?LOL When did Jeannette ever whip Johnson decisively? He beat him ONCE on a disputed foul in the 2nd rd of a fight in which Johnson was dominating the action! Jeannette stop Johnson? In 5 fights he never manged to even floor him!

      Johnson floored Jeannette multiple times in their series,Jeannette never knocked Johnson down.

      Johnson once fought Jeannette and another fighter ,Walter Johson on the same night ,he ko'd Johnson in3 rds and floored Jeannette 3 times in their 3 rd go , what had he to fear from Jeannette?

      Johnson refused to defend against Jeannette for $20,000 but he readily accepted both offers of $30,000 to fight him.
      Jeannette made a public statement concerning the 2 attempts to put on a title fight with Johnson in NY,absolving Johnson of any blame for the fights not happening.

      Me angry? You dont know enough about the subject for me to take you seriously let alone get angry about itLOL!
      I should be charging you for educating your thick mind!
      Stop embarrassing yourself FFS! It's Pitiful!
      Johnson couldn’t fight in NY, he knew the Jeannette fight would never be made. It was more showmanship.

      Jeannette had less than 20 fights when he fought his last match with Johnson. As he got bigger, stronger and better Johnson was sure to steer clear. History won’t change because you think you have insight to what was going on over 100 years ago that no one else has.

      Johnson took a fight for well less than $5K the same year he turned down Jeannette’s $20k, the end.
      Dr. Z Dr. Z likes this.

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post

        No proof of that except a fighter trying to be relevant in a historical moment. Every press report AND boxrec say Johnson was destroying him. Of course Burns would try and save face.
        - - For 100 years the fight was recorded as a KO before being changed to referee decision. Of course JJ ducks the lucrative rematch while ducking Sam and Joe while you continue to duck history...go git'em Tigger!!!

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by QueensburyRules View Post

          - - For 100 years the fight was recorded as a KO before being changed to referee decision. Of course JJ ducks the lucrative rematch while ducking Sam and Joe while you continue to duck history...go git'em Tigger!!!
          All you're doing is trying to change the fact that EVERYONE who saw and or was at the fight saw JJ pummeling Burns. You can't change this fact no matter how hard you try to.
          Ivich Ivich billeau2 billeau2 like this.

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post

            All you're doing is trying to change the fact that EVERYONE who saw and or was at the fight saw JJ pummeling Burns. You can't change this fact no matter how hard you try to.
            - - Narrative is multi sources with different descriptions, but seen the existent footage in the day and Tommy was the aggressor with JJ doing a lot of holding and clowning. Yeah, Tommy got clocked, but never seemed hurt and never stopped trying to take the fight to JJ that was the only way to win a decision in those days until Ali introduced the run and stink style that Americans took to.

            And remember how the fight was heavily doctored with rounds out of place such that the last footage makes it seem like Tommy was finished. Only in boxing can this stuff happen. See Cooper/Ali 1 for how that works...oh wait, never mind...pearls cast before swine yet again!

            We hear how JJ did the same to Hart such that the ref warned him to start fighting or else, but he never changed tactics and lost the decision. Then Burns whooped Hart who had won the vacant title by beating Root.

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post

              All you're doing is trying to change the fact that EVERYONE who saw and or was at the fight saw JJ pummeling Burns. You can't change this fact no matter how hard you try to.
              I think ,instead of giving him the attention he so desperately craves it will be better to put him on ignore.

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by Ivich View Post
                I think ,instead of giving him the attention he so desperately craves it will be better to put him on ignore.
                I would never tell anyone not to use the ignore feature. But it doesn't keep the ignored poster(s) from still trolling your threads anymore, and you will see them as long as others have quoted their comments. Besides, kicking Queenie around is enjoyable for the most part. Sure, he is a troll who doesn't back things up and will twist and even lie to try and make some imaginary point, but every once in awhile he will cast pearls of wisdom as he likes to so often say. At the end of the day I'd only suggest you do what's best for you, for your peace of mind. Besides, like yourself there are some very good posters to learn from here. Every once in awhile (why I don't ignore Queenie) I like to be the smartest person in the conversation.

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post

                  I would never tell anyone not to use the ignore feature. But it doesn't keep the ignored poster(s) from still trolling your threads anymore, and you will see them as long as others have quoted their comments. Besides, kicking Queenie around is enjoyable for the most part. Sure, he is a troll who doesn't back things up and will twist and even lie to try and make some imaginary point, but every once in awhile he will cast pearls of wisdom as he likes to so often say. At the end of the day I'd only suggest you do what's best for you, for your peace of mind. Besides, like yourself there are some very good posters to learn from here. Every once in awhile (why I don't ignore Queenie) I like to be the smartest person in the conversation.
                  "I like to be the smartest person in the conversation".This is a given if he is the other person!

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by Ivich View Post

                    "I like to be the smartest person in the conversation".This is a given if he is the other person!
                    - - Do your wives know you two gits are grooming each other?

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Damn. There's usually 3 making these silly accusations against Johnson but The Ol' Lef Hook apparently took a permanent ban because of you know what.


                      If you are watching, Lefy, I just wanna say good riddance

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP