Kyle Rittenhouse In SERIOUS Trouble After Federal Judge's Ruling

[ProblemChild_JakePaul]

He's just a dumb fat kid who brought a deadly weapon to a chaotic scene and killed two people.

I'm not here to argue. Just here to state facts.

[Stan Love]

He's just a dumb fat kid who brought a deadly weapon to a chaotic scene and killed two people.

I'm not here to argue. Just here to state facts.

Self defense.

[Offensive Wizardry]

of course it matters!! he willingly went to seek out the danger then claim his life was in danger. uhhhh DUH!!

look man, im not here to debate that he's guilty... i am only here to remind ya of Rittenhouse's thug behavior. his actions are of a thug. careless. reckless.

lol it doesnt matter.

whether you go to a danger zone or not,

if someone physically attacks you,

you have the right defend yourself.

uhhhh DUH!!!!!!




what are you in middle school?

[Offensive Wizardry]

im not here to argue if he's guilty or not.. i was only pointing out the fact that HE drove to the danger zone when his help was NOT needed. he also wasnt old enough to purchase the Ruger AR he used to kill them folks... he was also not old enough to be drinking... i was only pointing out his THUG behavior.. not sure why ya so uptight about this? Yes, whites can be thugs too as shown here with Mr. Rittenhouse's actions.

i get it. and I and other people on here are POINTING OUT THAT IT DOESNT MATTER IF HE WAS CALLED OR IF HE WENT TO THE DANGER ZONE.

HE HAS THE RIGHT TO DEFEND HIMSELF.

rittenhouse is not a thug. he doesnt have a criminal record to my knowledge. he's a good boy. he didnt do nuffin but help people who were under attack by the violent *** rioters. the only thug in this story are the convicted pedophile who attacked rittenhouse along with the other guy.

yes, white people can be thugs too as evidenced by the convicted pedophile who got put own by a true american patriot in kyle rittenhouse.

[IceTrayDaGang]

Again proving you didn’t watch the trial. It was proven at the trial that the auto shop owner was lying. Numerous witnesses testified to that. He also took a big smiling picture with the people protecting his business.

How dumb does one have to be to think a business owner wouldn’t want protection when thugs are burning down business districts.

which thugs? the protester's or the boy who drove across state with a firearm he was not legally old enough to own.

im not here to argue with you on if he's guilty or not. i said this numerous times. i am here to point on Kyle's thug tendency!

[Stan Love]

which thugs? the protester's or the boy who drove across state with a firearm he was not legally old enough to own.

im not here to argue with you on if he's guilty or not. i said this numerous times. i am here to point on Kyle's thug tendency!

The thugs were the ones staring the fires not putting them out. Not complicated.

still going with the state lines think huh.

[IceTrayDaGang]

i get it. and I and other people on here are POINTING OUT THAT IT DOESNT MATTER IF HE WAS CALLED OR IF HE WENT TO THE DANGER ZONE.

HE HAS THE RIGHT TO DEFEND HIMSELF.

rittenhouse is not a thug. he doesnt have a criminal record to my knowledge. he's a good boy. he didnt do nuffin but help people who were under attack by the violent *** rioters. the only thug in this story are the convicted pedophile who attacked rittenhouse along with the other guy.

yes, white people can be thugs too as evidenced by the convicted pedophile who got pud own by a true american patriot in kyle rittenhouse.

actually it does matter... he went to seek the danger when it wasn't directed towards him. he went and look for it. kinda like a suspect resisting. this is because Kyle's parents is not around to guide him in the right direction... what normal kid at 17 would think "i gotta go get a firearm so i can drive to another state to defend the businesses".. if Kyle was a hot head and got mad at someone, imagine what he could have done with the firearm he had!!! this is a school shooter in the making!!! #messsage!!!

[IceTrayDaGang]

The thugs were the ones staring the fires not putting them out. Not complicated.

still going with the state lines think huh.

yes, they were BOTH thugs. the one destroying businesses and the 17 year old who thought he'll drive across state with a firearm he was not legally old enough to own. what normal 17 year old think like this bruh??? this is a school shooter in the making!

[OldTerry]

he wasnt asked to help.. he wasnt old enough to buy that Ruger AR, he wasnt old enough to be drinking. that;s all facts that can be looked up. don't post with your emotions.

As true as all that may be, he was not guilty of murder. There is also the fact that those engaged against him were known criminals who were engaging in criminal acts.

[OldTerry]

facts still remain, that Ruger AR was not his, he wasnt old enough to be getting drunk at the bar. Nor sure why you mad about this?

It's because it is not relative to his guilt or innocence. In debating terms what you are doing is called a "red herring."