Comments Thread For: Malignaggi: Mayweather-Pacquiao Backlash Came From Casuals That Don't Really Understand Boxing

[Goldie]

I had a bias going into most Mayweather fights, I do not like him. Doesn't mean...

Actually, it does mean that what you say is irrelevant. You�re wasting your time quoting me.

[Combat Talk Radio]

Both guys were rich, neither one of them needed the money. They both needed to fight each other to prove who was better.

Once again, you are failing to understand.

Manny Pacquiao was and always has been the B-SIDE to Floyd Mayweather.

The B-Side must accept the demands of the A-Side.

Floyd is undefeated, Floyd was the money draw. He didn't have to prove anything.

Manny was the one with losses. He had to prove that he was better than Floyd. He failed to do it.

It's that simple.

[bojangles1987]

Actually, it does mean that what you say is irrelevant. You�re wasting your time quoting me.

You've made the fact I'm wasting my time very clear.

I don't understand why in the world this site insists on making everything about taking sides, where whether you like a fighter or not means you fall into every positive or negative opinion about that fighter. I would suggest you ask some of the saner Mayweather fans around here whether I'm the kind of person who just blindly attacks Mayweather but clearly you have don't care, you need a strawman to attack because apparently your entire identity is based around this nonsense.

Plus most of the sane Mayweather fans don't post anymore. It's all Pacquiao and Mayweather jackasses who have since latched on to Golovkin and Alvarez, or Wilder and Fury.

[Biolink]

Pretty sensible comments from Paulie, but I know people are probably crying about what he said, ,like emotional women.

[ussy]

Not a guy I hate more in boxing, this guy is a permanent laughing stock after the Artem fight. Cannot even take a word he says serious anymore, honestly think I�d ko the bum in a fight Lobov made it look easy lol