Once again what was considered a conspiracy is now questionable.

[GhostofDempsey]

The nerve of someone like Pelosi. She obviously interferes with things and tries to create problems at a time when politicians traditionally got their 5h1t together. Its downright sabatoge. Recently:

"Trump wants to decide when we go back to work." Media says: "He is a dictator dangerously abusing his power!"

"Trump wants to give governors the decision on when to go back to work."

Media says: "Trump is shiftless and shirking his duty to make decisions that the Federal Government must make."

You cannot make this stuff up. The media does not even try to hide it.

I cannot see how any reasonable adult without a catastrophic brain injury can continue to support her or these radical news outlets. Other than the lazy bums who want socialism and free rides.

[billeau2]

I cannot see how any reasonable adult without a catastrophic brain injury can continue to support her or these radical news outlets. Other than the lazy bums who want socialism and free rides.

Well like Ghost...see poor Nancy grew up a.... woman! So like her and Hillery they never got the opportunities see? I know I know, they have big houses and never worked a day in their lives... But its because they were victimized see? So even if they are vindictive, crazy biaches? that will destroy the country? just like in Atlas Shrugged? We should let them destroy the world...because they never got no opportunities see?

[siablo14]

I say I say... Tie Billeau and Shoulder Roll in straight Jackets! They are nuts? Or are they?



from the presidents orange tinted lips it cometh!! And when Alex Jones and his couterie of Gay Frogs came fourth to battle the forces of evil, proclaiming that Trump would take the swing states, he was crazy also...

My point here is not to validate every crazy thing said, but to implore my fellow posters to keep an open mind. I am also going to say it again, ***** will not run, it will be madam secretary, Killery Klinton.

A lot of things are going on, and the media is seriously compromised, have been for a long time now, keep an open mind folks.

Red - Stop this crap. Let's do a one month sig or shut up. Yes or no?

[billeau2]

Red - Stop this crap. Let's do a one month sig or shut up. Yes or no?

I have some conditions: If Hillary Clinton attempts to take the nomination and/or if there is a brokered convention then I am close enough, that nobody has to alter sig. If ***** does not run and Hillary is involved in this process for any reason... Nobody wins.

I know what she is going to try to do, I do not know for sure if she will succeed. This is more than fair because all that has to happen to "shut me up" is for ***** to be allowed the nomination and to run against Trump with no interference from Hillary. Heck! even if ***** does not run for reasons unrelated, you would win. Those should be more than generous conditions if you believe I am so off base right?

Fair enough?

[siablo14]

I have some conditions: If Hillary Clinton attempts to take the nomination and/or if there is a brokered convention then I am close enough, that nobody has to alter sig. If ***** does not run and Hillary is involved in this process for any reason... Nobody wins.

I know what she is going to try to do, I do not know for sure if she will succeed. This is more than fair because all that has to happen to "shut me up" is for ***** to be allowed the nomination and to run against Trump with no interference from Hillary. Heck! even if ***** does not run for reasons unrelated, you would win. Those should be more than generous conditions if you believe I am so off base right?

Fair enough?

You said the only condition necessary. I highlighted it in red. Only if Hillary is running against Trump, you will win. Once she isn't the one running against Trump, I win. Deal or no deal?

[billeau2]

You said the only condition necessary. I highlighted it in red. Only if Hillary is running against Trump, you will win. Once she isn't the one running against Trump, I win. Deal or no deal?

Your being chicken****t, no deal. If I am full of it, then there should be no attempt at Hillary taking the nomination and she should not cause a brokered convention.

You really think it is fair to me, if Hillary acts as I have said, and then is rebuffed that I was totally off base? Mind you I did not say if this happened you would have to give me your sig... I unlike you was being fair.

No man... Man up! If you think I am off then there are three distinct sets of possibilities:

1) I am totally correct, nuff said I get your sig

2) a)***** sails in and is nominated.
b) ***** is not nominated but another candidate for whatever reason is nominated, having nothing to do with Hillary, YOu get my sig

3) a)Hillary tries to take the nomination
b) Hillary causes a brokered convention and loses...*****, or whomever the nominee is, retains the nomination.

In which case neither of us gets a sig which is fair because I was correct about the process, but it was usurped. That is called being fair.

If you do not think this is fair, do a poll and if people agree with you I will agree to your terms.

Frankly I think you are being feminine again...Stand by your convictions, be a man, but fair play! Damn I cannot believe you would not take this sig and would rather force me into a situation where even though I called the situation, it was rebuffed. What a feminine thing to do!

[siablo14]

Your being chicken****t, no deal. If I am full of it, then there should be no attempt at Hillary taking the nomination and she should not cause a brokered convention.

You really think it is fair to me, if Hillary acts as I have said, and then is rebuffed that I was totally off base? Mind you I did not say if this happened you would have to give me your sig... I unlike you was being fair.

No man... Man up! If you think I am off then there are three distinct sets of possibilities:

1) I am totally correct, nuff said I get your sig

2) a)***** sails in and is nominated.
b) ***** is not nominated but another candidate for whatever reason is nominated, having nothing to do with Hillary, YOu get my sig

3) a)Hillary tries to take the nomination
b) Hillary causes a brokered convention and loses...*****, or whomever the nominee is, retains the nomination.

In which case neither of us gets a sig which is fair because I was correct about the process, but it was usurped. That is called being fair.

If you do not think this is fair, do a poll and if people agree with you I will agree to your terms.

Frankly I think you are being feminine again...Stand by your convictions, be a man, but fair play! Damn I cannot believe you would not take this sig and would rather force me into a situation where even though I called the situation, it was rebuffed. What a feminine thing to do!

I'll take the deal but your first comment said Hillary will be the nom. There was no dithering in that post. Deal on. One month sig. Anything goes.

Page bookmarked too.

[billeau2]

I'll take the deal but your first comment said Hillary will be the nom. There was no dithering in that post. Deal on. One month sig. Anything goes.

Page bookmarked too.

Bravo! I applaud your concession...that to me is fair play. Yes I did say that... and if she tries and does not become the nom, even though I was wrong, I was partially wrong because there was a legit attempt made.

My feeling about this situation is that we all exxagerate certain things we cannot control. In my opinion a sig bet like this is not like "pregnancy" where there is no almost. I think of it like, if Hillary tries and fails, we both are partially right and wrong, in one sense.

I understand this is subjective and am only explaining my reaction to the sig bet initially. I have no problem at all doing this with a sense of fair play.

You do not have to "BookMark" or "screen shot" there is little you could, or would do to me, compared to what I would do to myself if I ever sullied my name, by denying a took a bet that I took... please don't have that attitude bro, I am a man of my word and anticipate that you are as well...I don't need to bookmark anything Siablo. You would be the one who has to live with yourself if you denied a sig bet you made...not me lol.

Adults really do not have to do things like that fair enough?

[siablo14]

Bravo! I applaud your concession...that to me is fair play. Yes I did say that... and if she tries and does not become the nom, even though I was wrong, I was partially wrong because there was a legit attempt made.

My feeling about this situation is that we all exxagerate certain things we cannot control. In my opinion a sig bet like this is not like "pregnancy" where there is no almost. I think of it like, if Hillary tries and fails, we both are partially right and wrong, in one sense.

I understand this is subjective and am only explaining my reaction to the sig bet initially. I have no problem at all doing this with a sense of fair play.

You do not have to "BookMark" or "screen shot" there is little you could, or would do to me, compared to what I would do to myself if I ever sullied my name, by denying a took a bet that I took... please don't have that attitude bro, I am a man of my word and anticipate that you are as well...I don't need to bookmark anything Siablo. You would be the one who has to live with yourself if you denied a sig bet you made...not me lol.

Adults really do not have to do things like that fair enough?

True that. Zaroku did keep his bet.

[Chollo Vista]

I say I say... Tie Billeau and Shoulder Roll in straight Jackets! They are nuts? Or are they?



from the presidents orange tinted lips it cometh!! And when Alex Jones and his couterie of Gay Frogs came fourth to battle the forces of evil, proclaiming that Trump would take the swing states, he was crazy also...

My point here is not to validate every crazy thing said, but to implore my fellow posters to keep an open mind. I am also going to say it again, ***** will not run, it will be madam secretary, Killery Klinton.

A lot of things are going on, and the media is seriously compromised, have been for a long time now, keep an open mind folks.

I think it was definitely a bioweapon.

Wuhan-400 lol