Originally posted by billeau2
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
****** Harris Drops Out Of The 2020 Race
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by billeau2 View PostThings that don't make sense to me can irk me I apologize as I did not think you had a question that needed to be addressed.
I was not referring to a party, rather to a set of values. There is a tendency for individuals to label politicians with terms that are not really correct. So a "*******" is supposed to be about freedom through education. Obviously thats not how the term is used lol.
Progressives are just people who have high values and standards and compassion for other inividuals. Prosecutors as a whole do not generally hold these values, with some exceptions. Harris certainly never demonstrated these type values. Hope that clears it up.
Seems to me, as a seriously old guy, that "the progressive wing" of the party has sacrificed the working class vote on the altar of political correctness, or "social justice". We don't need to even think about the **********s who have sacrificed common sense and morality to the image of the Orange Calf.
Comment
-
Originally posted by John Barron View Post"progressives" are the far left-wing of the dem party. they are the loud and growing minority of SJW, socialist nutjobs that's overtaking the establishment dems in DC. their stooges are handpicked from casting calls held by "justice ********s" which was partly founded by scumbag cenk from TYT and i'm sure funded by Qatar, and fellow scumbag george soros.
Calling those leftist looneys progressive or ******* is an insult to ********.
They're too out there.
Comment
-
Originally posted by John Barron View Postmost Americans are for equality and all that good stuff. it's just a co-opted term at this point and by people who make a mockery of progressivism. the "progressive vote" is just the socialist SJW vote
People coopting these terms is a mockery of the concepts expressed. It is not right. Progressive qualities have nothing to do with political agendas, ******* policies do...But not the way people use the term. We are talking about people who were upset about debtor's prison's and child labor, etc...and people whom asked if there was something government could do for such individuals...Not people interested in taxing and redistributing wealth of the middle class.
By coopting these words the globalists have made the idea of educating oneself, something to be avoided because "college cost so much"etc. So soon people in this country will be more ignorant and socially malleable. Its very sad...Yes college has bad political operatives. It also has scholars that have understanding about areas of study we should know about. Tibetan language scholars are not socialist libtards who want to turn their students into gender neutral peons.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mooshashi View PostOk....in the old days, Dems were supposed to be the workingman's party, and the **********s were Big Business. I'm talking post Teddy Roosevelt and pro Civil Rights act, after which Southern racists went over to the **********s. Have the Dems abandoned working class people in order to maintain "high values and compassion " as you've said?
Seems to me, as a seriously old guy, that "the progressive wing" of the party has sacrificed the working class vote on the altar of political correctness, or "social justice". We don't need to even think about the **********s who have sacrificed common sense and morality to the image of the Orange Calf.
Research will show this to be, not something I say flipantly.
Trump is not from this group, which is why he is actually trying to do things politically, and interested in stopping wars, creating jobs, etc. What is funny is that Trump is dirty in other ways: For example, his involvement with the Russians has nothing to do with politics, it has everything to do with the cost of doing construction in New York City. You have to pay the Russian, and other controllers to build in the city, they own the services provided. Is Trump good? To me he is better than a Washington insider. No he is not a good person... He has destroyed people not paying them etc... But compared to the Clintons?
Political correctness? call it a sacrificial lamb, etc. It is a way to control free speech. It is a way to censure and to censor individuals, make them walk on eggshells and not speak truthfully. And social justice is classic double speak: It is the exact opposite of what it purports to be. So, there are no progressives in Washington, minus perhaps an odd congressman or even senator... If they were so they would not be there.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mooshashi View PostOk....in the old days, Dems were supposed to be the workingman's party, and the **********s were Big Business. I'm talking post Teddy Roosevelt and pro Civil Rights act, after which Southern racists went over to the **********s. Have the Dems abandoned working class people in order to maintain "high values and compassion " as you've said?
Seems to me, as a seriously old guy, that "the progressive wing" of the party has sacrificed the working class vote on the altar of political correctness, or "social justice". We don't need to even think about the **********s who have sacrificed common sense and morality to the image of the Orange Calf.
So lets take the term "Ground Zero." This term has been misappropriated to mean the bombing zone for 9-11. Most people do not even know the meaning of this term. It is the actual target for a nuclear blast. So what does it accomplish to take this term and missapropriate it to mean 9-11?
You can now socially condition people that 9-11 was a nuclear catastrophe. When you want to rile people up, etc, the mere mention of "ground zero" is a buzzword, an indication to trigger the most extreme feeling of hate and fear. Social conditioning at its best.
Comment
Comment