This is a yes or no question, no ifs and buts about it and while we are on topic, does MSM (main****** media) provide objective journalism from both sides of the equation? Again, this is a yes or no question.
Once you answer this genuinely and that's a big IF then you can escape your puppeteer masters, which is everything around you starting from your TV, radio stations, politicians, social media channels, movies, songs, books, athletes, actors and so on and so forth.
Jim Raynor is a special kind of idiot, he most likely would answer YES to this simple inquiry BUT he decides to believe when MSM provides objective information based on his menstrual cycle. One day, MSM is completely bias and corrupt, however, on the very next day he's preaching their gospel. Dude wakes up from sleepwalking realizing it is no ****ing good only to fall asleep again and walk the walk one more time. He would get run over a truck saying he got hit by a boat while in a dessert. He would get gang ****d by Antifa loons calling them black hetero thugs. I can obviously go on and on...
Once you answer this genuinely and that's a big IF then you can escape your puppeteer masters, which is everything around you starting from your TV, radio stations, politicians, social media channels, movies, songs, books, athletes, actors and so on and so forth.
Jim Raynor is a special kind of idiot, he most likely would answer YES to this simple inquiry BUT he decides to believe when MSM provides objective information based on his menstrual cycle. One day, MSM is completely bias and corrupt, however, on the very next day he's preaching their gospel. Dude wakes up from sleepwalking realizing it is no ****ing good only to fall asleep again and walk the walk one more time. He would get run over a truck saying he got hit by a boat while in a dessert. He would get gang ****d by Antifa loons calling them black hetero thugs. I can obviously go on and on...
Comment