why are people so bias when it comes to political things?

[i love boxing]

People watch different news stations to hear what they want to hear, if fox or cnn are both telling you 2 different things does it not cross your mind that both are probably being bias and the truth is somewhere in the middle? You can not call news fake just because it does not fit your view, that is insane.

I feel most news stories especially those that involve politics are all given to use with a slant depending on the financial contributions that company receives and from who they receive them from.

[Citizen Koba]

If you essentially regard all mass media as a form of propaganda reflecting and promoting certain sets of political and / or economic interests you won't go far wrong. There is no impartial media, the trick is always trying to understand what interests are being represented and interpreting the information presented to you through that lens.

[Rip Chudd]

I don't look at it from a political standpoint but if I see a so called "news outlet" reporting outright lies and trying to paint a narrative then it isn't one I would consider trustworthy. For example: when the whole Rittenhouse crap was going on there was footage showing him being attacked and him defending himself from attackers. Any "news source" calling him a murderer when the proof was right there in front of our eyes can't be trusted. Same thing with the Arbury footage, any "news source" defending the murderous fools that went after him isn't trust worthy

[Fists_of_Fury]

Would you trust "news" from a source that calls riots "mostly peaceful protests" with burning buildings in the background? I certainly call that fake news. I just use my eyes and common sense.

There's a certain narrative that certain "news" tries to push... whitey bad(and whitey adjacent), minority good(mainly black), even with clear evidence dis*****g that antiwhiteism nonsense. Anything against the agenda they push is deemed racist lol. Their whole shtick and most of their anchors are racist though but since it's against whites it's ok. They make sure to put the races if it's the rare black victim and white attacker but don't do the same when Tyrone is attacking Paul or Kung Lao. Kyle Rittenhouse was a "white supremacist" for defending himself from white thugs. A legit black supremacist runs over like 50 white people and it was an SUV attacks a parade. Clear bias and anti-white racism from that lot of "news" stations.

If you don't see that bias you are either dumb as f**k or a willing participant in the antiwhiteism. Tons watch that trash and then try to pawn it off as true or facts. When you refute the narrative you are deemed racist, anti-science, etc... I laugh at these clowns. The clear bias is from the ******* arm of media. I am a registered Independent but anti-******* because of their bias and antiwhiteism.

[Marchegiano]

In the middle?

If one man claims grass is blue, another says it's pink actually, is the middle the fact that grass is? Not much middle in politics, in my opinion, not much truth either. Just a bunch of horse**** spin to get people to believe in dumb****.

I think atheism and political activism goes hand-in-hand and most people are really just zealots in a new religion. At least cult, no one can tell me political groups don't act exactly like a cult.

IMO, more like:

"I see you don't like your neighbor very much. You're right not to, he's responsible for everything you don't like. If you support me I'll do what you do like."

over and over again.

"I see you don't much care for the man in office. You're right to, he's ****, but remember in four years you can rebel....by electing me"

Same **** isn't it?

Folks continue to have the same grievances, same problems, same blames, and, mind-numbingly the same ****ing solution every single time. We is gun vote fah our culture. Like as if that isn't exactly what got you here in the first place. Like that isn't exactly what the next rebellion will use to rally the troops.

When the next US election is up, will the right use the left's actions in power as the basis for why the right should gain power? ****ing assured isn't it. repeat, recycle, redo, same **** every single time all while the same circle of ****s stay in power.





Because it is totes super important to let the powerful know exactly what they need to do to keep you riled enough to always support them even though you get **** all but a bone here and there to be reversed by the neck guy so that the guy after him can flip it back.

I don't see a middle. I see two flavors of sales and marketing used to measure the opinions of the population so that the powerful can remain powerful and the frustrated can exercise their frustration in a government sanctioned rebellion that ensures the elite stay the elite and the peasants stay peasants.

[i love boxing]

Would you trust "news" from a source that calls riots "mostly peaceful protests" with burning buildings in the background? I certainly call that fake news. I just use my eyes and common sense.

There's a certain narrative that certain "news" tries to push... whitey bad(and whitey adjacent), minority good(mainly black), even with clear evidence dis*****g that antiwhiteism nonsense. Anything against the agenda they push is deemed racist lol. Their whole shtick and most of their anchors are racist though but since it's against whites it's ok. They make sure to put the races if it's the rare black victim and white attacker but don't do the same when Tyrone is attacking Paul or Kung Lao. Kyle Rittenhouse was a "white supremacist" for defending himself from white thugs. A legit black supremacist runs over like 50 white people and it was an SUV attacks a parade. Clear bias and anti-white racism from that lot of "news" stations.

If you don't see that bias you are either dumb as f**k or a willing participant in the antiwhiteism. Tons watch that trash and then try to pawn it off as true or facts. When you refute the narrative you are deemed racist, anti-science, etc... I laugh at these clowns. The clear bias is from the ******* arm of media. I am a registered Independent but anti-******* because of their bias and antiwhiteism.

I am white, and think that was just a down right ignorant statement that you made, everything is not race related, There are networks that tried to downplay the Jan 6th incident so as I said both sides are biased and I don't understand why people try to defend one side or the other when both are obviously not telling the entire truth.

[club fighter]

The truth is usually right down the middle, so if you're only listening to one side of the story, you know half of it is going to be bullshyt. Simple math.

[Beercules]

The truth is usually right down the middle, so if you're only listening to one side of the story, you know half of it is going to be bullshyt. Simple math.

Good post.

[man down]

Hmm please review my posts and look at all the sources I use. I'd bet you money I fox is the least links I post.

Chit the other day I got ripped for posting info from a dem site, a forum. I go there to see all the news that conservative sites don't show me. I'd bet you guys would be shocked at how many links I post from info on that site.

But some how I always get mocked for posting from "crazy sites" . The facts are, it doesn't matter where the info comes from. If someone doesn't like it they will be quick to label you.

Just a fact.

[man down]

http://jeetwin55.com/forums/n...andate-back-on









Just some of my last links. Tell me they're one sided and if they're wrong info.