YouTube Censors Bombshell Joe Rogan Interview With Cardiologist Peter McCullough

[ShoulderRoll]

Did they mention he was a member of the wackjobs? If they aren't presenting the full facts and his credibility then they're trying to mislead.

Why would that mean he has to be censored, though?

[Shadoww702]

He's a member of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, a crazy group of medical professionals that come up with crazy theories. Of course he was flagged for misinfo.

Go figure u have no problem with this.

Rtarded ppl like being told what to do and say.

[Shadoww702]

Why would that mean he has to be censored, though?

You are trying to reason with a full blown RTARD!!!!

Good Luck with that!

[Marchegiano]

Why would that mean he has to be censored, though?

it's their platform, Google can do whatever it wants with its service as far as I'm concerned.

It's like the same argument for here. I am one of the reasons we have a don't request unban for other members rules. I used to, every single ban. I give 0 ****s why someone was banned because I feel like the community will work it out. We can minimize whatever whack job we want to and if one half can't because the other half agrees then that's just the form of our community.

I don't believe in banning members for anything but illegal. Annoying is a ***** ass reason to censor.

That said, this is CBS's or some such. They can dictate whatever they like, ain't no point in crying about it. They ban, and they made a don't ask policy, so I don't waste my time. Effectively taking more control of what their membership looks like.

On my own site, I don't ban competitors, but I def think I can for **** all no reason.

[ShoulderRoll]

it's their platform, Google can do whatever it wants with its service as far as I'm concerned.

It's like the same argument for here. I am one of the reasons we have a don't request unban for other members rules. I used to, every single ban. I give 0 ****s why someone was banned because I feel like the community will work it out. We can minimize whatever whack job we want to and if one half can't because the other half agrees then that's just the form of our community.

I don't believe in banning members for anything but illegal. Annoying is a ***** ass reason to censor.

That said, this is CBS's or some such. They can dictate whatever they like, ain't no point in crying about it. They ban, and they made a don't ask policy, so I don't waste my time. Effectively taking more control of what their membership looks like.

On my own site, I don't ban competitors, but I def think I can for **** all no reason.

Certainly Google and YouTube and Twitter can do whatever they want with their services.

But why are they ALL engaged in shutting down dissenting opinions on this issue? It's like they're marching in lockstep.

[Marchegiano]

Certainly Google and YouTube and Twitter can do whatever they want with their services.

But why are they ALL engaged in shutting down dissenting opinions on this issue? It's like they're marching in lockstep.

I'm more familiar with big chem and the **** they work together to hide but I doubt it's very different....sales.

Dollars to doughnuts says between the left and right the left gives Big Tech more money. Which motivates Big T to make as many ******** as possible. They probably give 0 ****s about trans or covid or anything like that, it's probably more in growing customer bases and ****.

Throw a moral reason behind it so folks focus on morality and never pay attention to the customer management the companies are pulling off.

Most conservative tears I'd file under pushback. It's not a natural act for *************. No one was bitching about ******** 15 years ago, they started bitching when ******** started bitching....reactive bitching can not be the major market there. If your money is basically folks getting online to cry you like blue hair ******** more.


Just guessing, but the point is follow the money. The money is always the truth.

[Madison Boxing]

and to think a year or so ago we used to mock and laugh at how north korea, russia and china used control their media. the one good thing about this pandemic is that a lot of people are starting to wake up to MSM and lack of free speech.

[Beercules]

and to think a year or so ago we used to mock and laugh at how north korea, russia and china used control their media. the one good thing about this pandemic is that a lot of people are starting to wake up to MSM and lack of free speech.

I always thought they do censor our media but now its just obvious. They don't even hide it

I only watch local news anyway but even that ****s bad.

[GhostofDempsey]

This is nothing new. The big tech social media and main****** media have been banning and censoring anyone who dares to speak out against vaccines or vaccine alternatives. Big Pharma has a lot of muscle, and China is now the puppet master of the ********ic party as well as the RINO **********s.

[man down]

Here ya go for anyone that wants to hear it.