Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Derek Chauvin files for new trial in death of George Floyd—Juror lied about attending *** Protest

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Derek Chauvin files for new trial in death of George Floyd—Juror lied about attending *** Protest

    Ex- police officer Derek Chauvin has filed a motion seeking a new trial in the death of , arguing that his constitutional right to a fair trial was violated multiple times throughout the proceedings.

    Defense attorney Eric Nelson took issue with the judge’s refusal to grant a change of venue and the decision to not sequester jurors during the trial, among other things in a 10-point post-verdict filing.

    "The cumulative effect of the multiple errors in these proceedings deprived Mr. Chauvin of a fair trial, in violation of his constitutional rights," the filing reads.

    Nelson argued that it was unconstitutional when the court declined to compel testimony from , a suspected drug dealer and friend of Floyd’s who was with him at the time of the May 25, 2020 incident that led to his death.

    The Court abused its discretion and violated Mr. Chauvin’s rights under the Confrontation Clause when it failed to order Morries Hall to testify, or in the alternative, to admit into evidence Mr. Hall’s statements to law enforcement regarding his interactions with George Floyd and presence at the May 25, 2020 incident."

    Hall invoked the Fifth ********* to avoid testifying, but he had made statements to police that were not revealed to jurors, despite Nelson’s attempts to have them read in court.

    Nelson also accused prosecutors of "pervasive, prejudicial prosecutorial misconduct" and alleged that jurors convicted Chauvin on charges that the evidence did not sufficiently support.

    "The Court abused its discretion when it submitted instructions to the jury that failed to accurately reflect the law with respect to second-degree unintentional murder, third-degree murder and authorized use of force," the filing reads.

    In addition to requesting a new trial, Nelson also asked for the guilty verdicts against Chauvin to be tossed.

    Two notable potential areas of conflict were left out of the filing – controversial remarks from Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., and a juror who was photographed at a Black Lives Matter protest but failed to acknowledge it on the pretrial questionnaire given to potential jury members.

    Waters had said she would urge protesters to "get more confrontational" if Chauvin had been acquitted at trial.

    And , the juror, was photographed last summer at a Washington, D.C., *** rally wearing a T-shirt that said "Get your knee off our neck" – a reference to Floyd's death after Chauvin knelt on his neck for nearly nine minutes on video.

    The questionnaire asked directly whether potential jurors had attended protests over the death of Floyd or over police brutality. Mitchell answered "no" to both questions.

    He declined to comment Tuesday.


    01B41566-5235-45FC-93FB-5EE5E7202319.jpeg

    #2
    Originally posted by GhostofDempsey View Post
    Ex- police officer Derek Chauvin has filed a motion seeking a new trial in the death of , arguing that his constitutional right to a fair trial was violated multiple times throughout the proceedings.

    Defense attorney Eric Nelson took issue with the judge’s refusal to grant a change of venue and the decision to not sequester jurors during the trial, among other things in a 10-point post-verdict filing.

    "The cumulative effect of the multiple errors in these proceedings deprived Mr. Chauvin of a fair trial, in violation of his constitutional rights," the filing reads.

    Nelson argued that it was unconstitutional when the court declined to compel testimony from , a suspected drug dealer and friend of Floyd’s who was with him at the time of the May 25, 2020 incident that led to his death.

    The Court abused its discretion and violated Mr. Chauvin’s rights under the Confrontation Clause when it failed to order Morries Hall to testify, or in the alternative, to admit into evidence Mr. Hall’s statements to law enforcement regarding his interactions with George Floyd and presence at the May 25, 2020 incident."

    Hall invoked the Fifth ********* to avoid testifying, but he had made statements to police that were not revealed to jurors, despite Nelson’s attempts to have them read in court.

    Nelson also accused prosecutors of "pervasive, prejudicial prosecutorial misconduct" and alleged that jurors convicted Chauvin on charges that the evidence did not sufficiently support.

    "The Court abused its discretion when it submitted instructions to the jury that failed to accurately reflect the law with respect to second-degree unintentional murder, third-degree murder and authorized use of force," the filing reads.

    In addition to requesting a new trial, Nelson also asked for the guilty verdicts against Chauvin to be tossed.

    Two notable potential areas of conflict were left out of the filing – controversial remarks from Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., and a juror who was photographed at a Black Lives Matter protest but failed to acknowledge it on the pretrial questionnaire given to potential jury members.

    Waters had said she would urge protesters to "get more confrontational" if Chauvin had been acquitted at trial.

    And , the juror, was photographed last summer at a Washington, D.C., *** rally wearing a T-shirt that said "Get your knee off our neck" – a reference to Floyd's death after Chauvin knelt on his neck for nearly nine minutes on video.

    The questionnaire asked directly whether potential jurors had attended protests over the death of Floyd or over police brutality. Mitchell answered "no" to both questions.

    He declined to comment Tuesday.


    01B41566-5235-45FC-93FB-5EE5E7202319.jpeg
    Dude you fixing to get hate

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by Zaroku View Post

      Dude you fixing to get hate
      You know it. Between all the mistakes the judge made, the threats of violence by Maxine Waters and now this, a lying juror who was full of bias from the start. Not a good look.
      Zaroku Zaroku likes this.

      Comment


        #4
        Can't trust them
















        Comment


          #5
          Derek Chauvin did a bad thing and deserves to be punished. Still, based on what has been brought out he did not receive a fair trial. The conviction should be overturned and the DA required to retry Chauvin or reach a plea deal. An impartial retrial would be very difficult given the immense media coverage given the to the first trial.
          Last edited by OldTerry; 05-07-2021, 12:00 PM.
          Marchegiano Marchegiano likes this.

          Comment


            #6
            Look on his knee on the dead-man's neck.

            Sad, some of y'all consider yourself reasonable. All y'all should be ashamed of y'allselves except Zaroku and abuelo Terry. Those two are nuts.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by OldTerry View Post
              Derek Chauvin did a bad thing and deserves to be punished. Still, based on what has been brought out he did not receive a fair trial. The conviction should be overturned and the DA required to retry Chauvin or reach a pleas deal. An impartial retrial would be very difficult given the immense media coverage given the to the first trial.
              Its very strange... They had a list of the jurists, its interesting how their proclivities lay. Most of them were very biased against Chauvin from the get-go. They were still selected, and I don't pretend to know what this means. I agree that despite what Chauvin did, we cannot let jury trials become political machinations. Its a mess... Police training procedures are such that they flash a big neon sign ENTER HERE for those who are sociopaths in the general population. There are great cops as well, but the lack of training and permission to use deadly force at the expense of better equipment and training, is an invitation for those who are violent abusers.
              OldTerry OldTerry likes this.

              Comment


                #8
                Mitchell that his uncle posted the photo. Mitchell said he attended an Aug. 28 event commemorating the anniversary of King's "I Have a Dream" speech.

                "I think I was being extremely honest" during the jury selection process, Mitchell said. "I gave my views on everything -- on the case, on Black Lives Matter."


                If true, I don't see the issue.

                siablo14 siablo14 likes this.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by OldTerry View Post
                  Derek Chauvin did a bad thing and deserves to be punished. Still, based on what has been brought out he did not receive a fair trial. The conviction should be overturned and the DA required to retry Chauvin or reach a pleas deal. An impartial retrial would be very difficult given the immense media coverage given the to the first trial.
                  Agreed. It wouldn’t be fair for Chauvin to get an acquittal in a retrial and not do any time. Aside from the reasons his attorney cited, there was plenty of blame to go around between Waters and ***** echoing their bias and creating a climate of intimidation and hostility to a lying juror who had a predisposed bias. It will be interesting to see how this plays out.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    If the people of Minnesota burned the cities to the ground in the event Chauvin was acquitted, it wouldn't be because Maxine Waters told them to do so

                    You guy's will reach for anything if given the opportunity
                    siablo14 siablo14 likes this.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP