Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is Canelo on your p4p list now

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by Pain~Lucy View Post

    or both damn it
    how is canelos win over lara not atleast equal to or better then kovlaves win over an aged bhop???

    lara was the undefeated cuban boogeyman at jr MW,no one wanted to fight that dude

    Comment


      #12
      No. He has decent wins but let's be honest none are overly impressive. He's never really came out a fight looking like a dominant p4p fighter. His best win is Lara and that could have went either way. Canelo is what he is. But he's no Oscar. **** I'm not even sure he's a Fernando Vargas.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by El-blanco View Post
        Hopkins>cotto, even at his age. Pascal is Lara level, angulo is garbage and trout is cleverly level. The difference is kovalev beat the **** out of all of them. They're not even in the same league to me.
        50 year old Hopkins wasn't better than Cotto.

        I love B-Hop but after the Pascal wins he fought fights that he knew were perfect stylistically and winnable at his age. You saw what happened against Chad Dawson and Kovalev.

        Pascal is closer to Trout level (Clev is not near that level), he's not close to as good as Lara.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by STAX ON DECK View Post
          how is canelos win over lara not atleast equal to or better then kovlaves win over an aged bhop???

          lara was the undefeated cuban boogeyman at jr MW,no one wanted to fight that dude
          bh0p is one-sided and lara fight is debatable, size and power advantage against cotto is also obvious, just sleep man and you'll soon realize

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by Pain~Lucy View Post
            bh0p is one-sided and lara fight is debatable, size and power advantage against cotto is also obvious, just sleep man and you'll soon realize
            whatever,yall will see when nelo beats triple G up, it will happen mark my words

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by Showtime.. View Post
              Maybe 10th. I have my opinions though. Pacquiao was and still is #1 on mine.
              Canelo/Cotto was a draw.
              I agree pac is #1 y all must have forgot

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by STAX ON DECK View Post
                whatever,yall will see when nelo beats triple G up, it will happen mark my words
                Come on bro, he couldn't even beat cotto up. He did enough to win.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by STAX ON DECK View Post
                  whatever,yall will see when nelo beats triple G up, it will happen mark my words
                  Lol stax...time to come down. I get it u are celebrating. But no bro. Just no.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Yet people still don't give Danny credit when canelo has the most bogus cards in every single fight

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Definitely. Two division champ with wins over cotto, lara, and trout. Vazquez and rhodes were decent as well. Kirkland, angulo, mosley, cintron, and Josesito were just used to pad his record up with known names though.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP