Originally posted by RJJ-94-02=GOAT
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Prime Haney vs Prime Pacquiao at @140
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by The Big Dunn View PostI’m taking Haney. Prime Manny avoided Zahir Raheem after he annihilated Morales, who had just come off beating Manny.
Bob and his matchmakers knew it would be problematic for Manny to beat him.
Haney reminds me of Raheem- fast, athletic, not too powerful, long reach- all the attributes Manny has issues with.
Comment
-
Originally posted by champion4ever View PostI would favor a prime Pac over a prime Haney. As Haney still has a lot to prove. He hasn't even scratched the surface of his potential yet.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ELPacman View PostA prime, shoulder injury free Pac could close the distance faster than any fighter I think I've seen. It was incredible how he'd get in and all a sudden take away your favorite weapon because he would punish you for using it.
I have no doubt Pac would of obliterated weight bully Haney. Pac's power at 147lbs was honest enough to keep you from getting reckless with him, but 140lbs and below it was more devastating because he was even faster.
Comment
-
Originally posted by HawkHogan View PostI think Pac's the most overrated boxer of our lifetime. Haney beats him but Pac wins a gift and cries about an injury he hadn't spoken about prior to his poor performance.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by messi807 View PostFanboys are going to say Pac beat’s whomever, pointless argument.
However if you want to delve into facts. Pac has fought 3 elite counter-punchers in his career and lost to all THREE. Marquez, (a past prime Morales, in a fight he got outboxed and barely won more than 3 rounds) and a 38 year old Floyd who had his way with Pac for 9 rounds.
Haney would probably beat him at 140, Pac was an amazing fighter - never unbeatable though, no matter what nonsense his fans push.
Of course, the usual suspects were involved in that bogus win for Floyd, such as Moretti.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cypocryphy View Post
Pacquiao beat Floyd. Anyone who knows boxing knows Manny beat Floyd and that Manny landed more punches, was the effective aggressor and even stunned Floyd a couple times in that fight. Even Floyd's father knew he was losing. He kept asking Floyd why he was fighting scared.
Of course, the usual suspects were involved in that bogus win for Floyd, such as Moretti.
Let me guess, you’re one of those “I’m right and everyone else is wrong” dumb phuckers.Last edited by just the facts; 12-21-2023, 01:04 AM.
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Originally posted by just the facts View Post
Dumb, even for a moron like you. Not one CREDIBLE boxing analyst, historian or publication had Manny winning. Again, not one. 16 out of the 18 networks covering the fight had Floyd winning and the other two (both out of the Phillipines) had it a draw. The biggest Floyd hater/Manny lover on HBO (Lampley) had Floyd winning. The biggest Floyd hater/Manny lover on this website (PAC-BOY) had Floyd winning. If Arum or Roach even remotely thought Manny won, they would have screamed robbery at the top of their lungs. They didn’t. Floyd won and won EASILY!
Let me guess, you’re one of those “I’m right and everyone else is wrong” dumb phuckers.
Comment
-
Originally posted by just the facts View Post
Dumb, even for a moron like you. Not one CREDIBLE boxing analyst, historian or publication had Manny winning. Again, not one. 16 out of the 18 networks covering the fight had Floyd winning and the other two (both out of the Phillipines) had it a draw. The biggest Floyd hater/Manny lover on HBO (Lampley) had Floyd winning. The biggest Floyd hater/Manny lover on this website (PAC-BOY) had Floyd winning. If Arum or Roach even remotely thought Manny won, they would have screamed robbery at the top of their lungs. They didn’t. Floyd won and won EASILY!
Let me guess, you’re one of those “I’m right and everyone else is wrong” dumb phuckers.
Comment
Comment