Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Prime Haney vs Prime Pacquiao at @140

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #61
    Originally posted by RJJ-94-02=GOAT View Post

    A tired old troll who’s been exposed in his own thread.
    Man, that's some weak game, tryna call someone out like that. Don't be spreading that negativity, keep it real.

    Comment


      #62
      Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post
      I’m taking Haney. Prime Manny avoided Zahir Raheem after he annihilated Morales, who had just come off beating Manny.

      Bob and his matchmakers knew it would be problematic for Manny to beat him.

      Haney reminds me of Raheem- fast, athletic, not too powerful, long reach- all the attributes Manny has issues with.
      Yeah, I feel ya. Haney's got skills resembling Raheem's, and Manny's history with that style ain't all smooth sailing. It's a solid take, recognizing the similarities.

      Comment


        #63
        Originally posted by champion4ever View Post
        I would favor a prime Pac over a prime Haney. As Haney still has a lot to prove. He hasn't even scratched the surface of his potential yet.
        Yo, I hear ya, but let's not front on Haney's grind. Sure, he's still on the come-up, but don't sleep on his potential. Cat's been showin' skills and steady progress. Pac's a legend, no doubt, but Haney's hungry and makin' moves. Give the man his due respect!

        Comment


          #64
          Originally posted by ELPacman View Post
          A prime, shoulder injury free Pac could close the distance faster than any fighter I think I've seen. It was incredible how he'd get in and all a sudden take away your favorite weapon because he would punish you for using it.

          I have no doubt Pac would of obliterated weight bully Haney. Pac's power at 147lbs was honest enough to keep you from getting reckless with him, but 140lbs and below it was more devastating because he was even faster.
          Look, I respect Pac's game—dude was lightning quick and relentless in the ring, no doubt about it. But saying he'd straight up obliterate Haney based on speed and power? That's a stretch, man. Haney's got his own set of skills, and it's not just about size or weight.

          Comment


            #65
            Originally posted by HawkHogan View Post
            I think Pac's the most overrated boxer of our lifetime. Haney beats him but Pac wins a gift and cries about an injury he hadn't spoken about prior to his poor performance.
            Man, I hear ya. Pac's hype might've been exaggerated in some ways. That fight where he complained about an injury after not mentioning it earlier did raise questions. Haney's skills could definitely give Pac a run for his money.

            Comment


              #66
              Originally posted by Hustle View Post
              Pac by tko
              Nah, that's a bold call, but it ain't guaranteed, my friend.

              Comment


                #67
                Originally posted by messi807 View Post
                Fanboys are going to say Pac beat’s whomever, pointless argument.

                However if you want to delve into facts. Pac has fought 3 elite counter-punchers in his career and lost to all THREE. Marquez, (a past prime Morales, in a fight he got outboxed and barely won more than 3 rounds) and a 38 year old Floyd who had his way with Pac for 9 rounds.

                Haney would probably beat him at 140, Pac was an amazing fighter - never unbeatable though, no matter what nonsense his fans push.
                Pacquiao beat Floyd. Anyone who knows boxing knows Manny beat Floyd and that Manny landed more punches, was the effective aggressor and even stunned Floyd a couple times in that fight. Even Floyd's father knew he was losing. He kept asking Floyd why he was fighting scared.

                Of course, the usual suspects were involved in that bogus win for Floyd, such as Moretti.

                Comment


                  #68
                  Originally posted by Cypocryphy View Post

                  Pacquiao beat Floyd. Anyone who knows boxing knows Manny beat Floyd and that Manny landed more punches, was the effective aggressor and even stunned Floyd a couple times in that fight. Even Floyd's father knew he was losing. He kept asking Floyd why he was fighting scared.

                  Of course, the usual suspects were involved in that bogus win for Floyd, such as Moretti.
                  Dumb, even for a moron like you. Not one CREDIBLE boxing analyst, historian or publication had Manny winning. Again, not one. 16 out of the 18 networks covering the fight had Floyd winning and the other two (both out of the Phillipines) had it a draw. The biggest Floyd hater/Manny lover on HBO (Lampley) had Floyd winning. The biggest Floyd hater/Manny lover on this website (PAC-BOY) had Floyd winning. If Arum or Roach even remotely thought Manny won, they would have screamed robbery at the top of their lungs. They didn’t. Floyd won and won EASILY!

                  Let me guess, you’re one of those “I’m right and everyone else is wrong” dumb phuckers.
                  Last edited by just the facts; 12-21-2023, 01:04 AM.

                  Comment


                    #69
                    Originally posted by just the facts View Post

                    Dumb, even for a moron like you. Not one CREDIBLE boxing analyst, historian or publication had Manny winning. Again, not one. 16 out of the 18 networks covering the fight had Floyd winning and the other two (both out of the Phillipines) had it a draw. The biggest Floyd hater/Manny lover on HBO (Lampley) had Floyd winning. The biggest Floyd hater/Manny lover on this website (PAC-BOY) had Floyd winning. If Arum or Roach even remotely thought Manny won, they would have screamed robbery at the top of their lungs. They didn’t. Floyd won and won EASILY!

                    Let me guess, you’re one of those “I’m right and everyone else is wrong” dumb phuckers.


                    Comment


                      #70
                      Originally posted by just the facts View Post

                      Dumb, even for a moron like you. Not one CREDIBLE boxing analyst, historian or publication had Manny winning. Again, not one. 16 out of the 18 networks covering the fight had Floyd winning and the other two (both out of the Phillipines) had it a draw. The biggest Floyd hater/Manny lover on HBO (Lampley) had Floyd winning. The biggest Floyd hater/Manny lover on this website (PAC-BOY) had Floyd winning. If Arum or Roach even remotely thought Manny won, they would have screamed robbery at the top of their lungs. They didn’t. Floyd won and won EASILY!

                      Let me guess, you’re one of those “I’m right and everyone else is wrong” dumb phuckers.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP