Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bernard whoops the dog **** out of Cal***gy at 170.....

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Bernard whoops the dog **** out of Cal***gy at 170.....

    They fought at 175 in the first fight and we all saw an old slow Hopkins who ran out of gas, and lost a SD that went to the wrong person.

    At 170 we saw him fight Pavlik with speed, agility, and ENDURANCE.

    At 170 its a totally different Bernard. Bernard should have won the first one, and knows he will whoop Joe at 170 or 168.

    Joe knows this too, thats why he wont give Bernard a rematch.

    Sorry Brit fans, but this is true.

    You and I and everyone one BS knows this.

    #2
    who would win at 250??? could be for the ring heavyweight title..


    xx

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by HTownTexan View Post
      They fought at 175 in the first fight and we all saw an old slow Hopkins who ran out of gas, and lost a SD that went to the wrong person.

      At 170 we saw him fight Pavlik with speed, agility, and ENDURANCE.

      At 170 its a totally different Bernard. Bernard should have won the first one, and knows he will whoop Joe at 170 or 168.

      Joe knows this too, thats why he wont give Bernard a rematch.

      Sorry Brit fans, but this is true.

      You and I and everyone one BS knows this.
      The difference isn't the weight, it's who he's fighting...

      Hopkins at 175 looked great against Tarver
      Hopkins at 170 looked bad against Winky
      Hopkins at 175 looked bad against Calzaghe
      Hopkins at 170 looked great against Pavlik

      See? It's not the weight, it's the opponent. Pavlik couldn't adapt, so Hopkins could do whatever he wanted to. He just toyed with him, but Calzaghe adapted and made Hopkins fight when he didn't want to, and even though he wasn't landing clean he was pressuring and hitting Hopkins all the time. And at 43, Hopkins just couldn't keep up..

      Comment


        #4
        calzaghe would win even easier you idiot as he is a career 168, hopkins had big size advantage over joe and he still lost.

        Comment


          #5
          Calzaghes first fight at the weight HE has the reasons not to perform. Calzaghe now with a referee that wouldnt allow Hopkins to hold and i doubt Hopkins wins more than 3rds.

          Pavlik fought like a can no head movement no combinations and footwork that would make George Foreman cringe.

          Because Calzaghe ruined Roy and Hopkins ruined Pavlik doesnt = a different out come.

          Comment


            #6
            what about an annerexic superfight at 145 with the winner getting hatton...


            xx

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by T-97 View Post
              The difference isn't the weight, it's who he's fighting...

              Hopkins at 175 looked great against Tarver
              Hopkins at 170 looked bad against Winky
              Hopkins at 175 looked bad against Calzaghe
              Hopkins at 170 looked great against Pavlik

              See? It's not the weight, it's the opponent. Pavlik couldn't adapt, so Hopkins could do whatever he wanted to. He just toyed with him, but Calzaghe adapted and made Hopkins fight when he didn't want to, and even though he wasn't landing clean he was pressuring and hitting Hopkins all the time. And at 43, Hopkins just couldn't keep up..
              He couldnt keep up because he wasnt in his best shape. If he showed that he makes 170 EASY, that shows that 175 is not his best weight. Everyone looks like **** against Winky, its what Winky does. But against Winky he didnt get tired, and with Winky defense they both held alot.

              All that I am saying is at 170 Bernard beats Joe. He beat Joe the first time and didnt get the decision because he got tired and so on. Bernard at 170 is in better shape and doesnt get tired so easily. Bernard win a wide UD in B vs Joe 2.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by T-97 View Post
                The difference isn't the weight, it's who he's fighting...

                Hopkins at 175 looked great against Tarver
                Hopkins at 170 looked bad against Winky
                Hopkins at 175 looked bad against Calzaghe
                Hopkins at 170 looked great against Pavlik

                See? It's not the weight, it's the opponent. Pavlik couldn't adapt, so Hopkins could do whatever he wanted to. He just toyed with him, but Calzaghe adapted and made Hopkins fight when he didn't want to, and even though he wasn't landing clean he was pressuring and hitting Hopkins all the time. And at 43, Hopkins just couldn't keep up..
                Totally agree!!!!!!!!

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by HTownTexan View Post
                  They fought at 175 in the first fight and we all saw an old slow Hopkins who ran out of gas, and lost a SD that went to the wrong person.

                  At 170 we saw him fight Pavlik with speed, agility, and ENDURANCE.

                  At 170 its a totally different Bernard. Bernard should have won the first one, and knows he will whoop Joe at 170 or 168.

                  Joe knows this too, thats why he wont give Bernard a rematch.

                  Sorry Brit fans, but this is true.

                  You and I and everyone one BS knows this.
                  Absolutely ******ed post.

                  See T-97's reply.

                  STYLES MAKE FIGHTS.

                  5 pounds = nothing.

                  Bye.



                  | |

                  Comment


                    #10
                    personally i think your a very ugly looking man.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP