Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is Oscar at 154 tougher than Margarito and Cotto?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Is Oscar at 154 tougher than Margarito and Cotto?

    Because according to this douche bag he is...

    I highly disagree...

    Originally posted by Bad_Barracuda View Post
    Oscar at 154 is a tougher fight than both Cotto and the Tijuana Toronado. At least Oscar has some defense.
    67
    YES
    31.34%
    21
    NO
    68.66%
    46

    #2
    Originally posted by KING ☼ View Post
    Because according to this douche bag he is...

    I highly disagree...
    Bad Barracuda also can't tell the difference between the achievements of Joe Calzaghe and Roger Mayweather, I wouldn't take anything this halfwit says too seriously.

    Comment


      #3
      No...........

      Comment


        #4
        hell to the no

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by x-LuKe-x View Post
          Bad Barracuda also can't tell the difference between the achievements of Joe Calzaghe and Roger Mayweather, I wouldn't take anything this halfwit says too seriously.
          Actually those are quite the same. Only Calzaghe is a white boy and as such he had the right to a padded record and only fighting really good fighters when they are 40+ years old. Don't fool yourself.

          Comment


            #6
            I wonder if we can get everyone who voted yes banned.

            They obviously don't know **** about boxing.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Allucard View Post
              Actually those are quite the same. Only Calzaghe is a white boy and as such he had the right to a padded record and only fighting really good fighters when they are 40+ years old. Don't fool yourself.

              So had Mayweather, in fact Mayweather SHOULD have 2 losses in his record right now! Actually 3!

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by Allucard View Post
                Actually those are quite the same. Only Calzaghe is a white boy and as such he had the right to a padded record and only fighting really good fighters when they are 40+ years old. Don't fool yourself.
                I'm not talking about comparing them, saying they are simliar, I'm talking about believing Roger held a world title for 10 years, unified it twice against younger and undefeated opposition favoured to beat him, then stepped up a division and won the ring belt from the consensus best fighter in the division.

                The guy is a tool.

                Also, do NOT compare Calzaghe to Roger, you will only embarrass yourself when even Calzaghe's most avid haters disagree with you.

                Comment


                  #9
                  LOL that makes me laugh.... De La Hoya is done for. This next fight is gonna be embarrassing and a major bore.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by ~Lucky13~ View Post
                    So had Mayweather, in fact Mayweather SHOULD have 2 losses in his record right now! Actually 3!
                    [sarcasm]Cut the man some slack, he's talking about ROGER Mayweather.

                    That changes everything![/sarcasm]

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP