Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Judge orders Hillary Clinton deposition in email flap

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Judge orders Hillary Clinton deposition in email flap

    I'm sure she will just use the "I don't recall, I don't remember" defense....or "what difference at this point does it make?" Regardless, it will be nice to watch her get a little rattled and squirm like the snake that she is.

    A federal judge has ordered former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to sit for a sworn deposition for the first time in connection with her use of a private email account during her State Department tenure.

    U.S. District Court Royce Lamberth issued the order Monday in connection with a five-and-a-half-year-old Freedom of Information Act lawsuit the conservative group Judicial Watch filed seeking emails related to the deadly 2012 attack on U.S. facilities in Benghazi, Libya.

    Clinton was previously required to submit a sworn written statement about her email use, but the deposition�if it takes place�would be the first time she has had to submit to live questioning under oath on the subject.

    During her four years in President Barack *****'s Cabinet, Clinton relied on a private email account and server for both her work-related and personal messages. The practice led to a storm of controversy that roiled her 2016 presidential bid and is widely viewed as contributing to her ultimate defeat by Donald Trump.

    In response to press questions during the campaign and in the sworn statement, Clinton said she kept the private account and server after taking over as secretary of state in 2009 as a matter of convenience and not to avoid FOIA or other disclosure requirements. The FBI investigated, interviewed Clinton and recommended against criminal charges, but it did find dozens of messages in her account that officials said contained highly classified information.

    However, Lamberth said in his ruling Monday that the FBI probe and representations by the State Department have not adequately put to rest questions about the episode and Clinton's deposition is needed to address those concerns.

    "To argue that the Court now has enough information to determine whether State conducted an adequate search is preposterous," wrote Lamberth, who has tangled with Clinton aides for decades in a series of cases.

    The judge, an appointee of President Ronald Reagan, said the fact that more Clinton emails continue to dribble out from the State Department raises questions about the thoroughness of the government's earlier actions to recover Clinton's messages.

    "Even years after the FBI investigation, the slow trickle of new emails has yet to be explained," Lamberth wrote. He blasted Clinton's prior answers given in response to another judge's order as "incomplete, unhelpful, or cursory, at best."

    Among the questions Lamberth said Clinton still needs to answer: "How did she arrive at her belief that her private server emails would be preserved by normal State Department processes for email retention? Who told her that�if anyone�and when? Did she realize State was giving 'no records' response to FOIA requests for her emails? If so, did she suspect that she had any obligation to disclose the existence of her private server to those at State handling the FOIA requests? ... And why did she think that using a private server to conduct State Department business was permissible under the law in the first place?"

    In addition to ordering Clinton's deposition, Lamberth said he'll require Clinton's former chief of staff Cheryl Mills to be deposed, although she was already questioned, in-person and under-oath by Judicial Watch about the issue in another FOIA case. The judge also approved a subpoena to Google for any Clinton emails it may possess.

    Lamberth said Clinton and Mills may be questioned specifically about their knowledge of records related to the Benghazi attack, but not about their response to the assault, which killed four Americans including the U.S. ambassador to Libya.

    Lawyers for Clinton and Mills did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the judge's order.



    #2
    The judge better have a good security detail and have his life insurance premiums paid up.

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by 1bad65 View Post
      The judge better have a good security detail and have his life insurance premiums paid up.
      You aint kidding. Their problems get solved in the desert, jails or busy streets. They dont care. Most feared gangsters since gotti.

      Comment


        #4
        Anyone else in State Dept or DoD would be found guilty. What a POS she is to think she’s above the law.

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by GhostofDempsey View Post
          I'm sure she will just use the "I don't recall, I don't remember" defense....or "what difference at this point does it make?" Regardless, it will be nice to watch her get a little rattled and squirm like the snake that she is.

          A federal judge has ordered former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to sit for a sworn deposition for the first time in connection with her use of a private email account during her State Department tenure.

          U.S. District Court Royce Lamberth issued the order Monday in connection with a five-and-a-half-year-old Freedom of Information Act lawsuit the conservative group Judicial Watch filed seeking emails related to the deadly 2012 attack on U.S. facilities in Benghazi, Libya.

          Clinton was previously required to submit a sworn written statement about her email use, but the deposition�if it takes place�would be the first time she has had to submit to live questioning under oath on the subject.

          During her four years in President Barack *****'s Cabinet, Clinton relied on a private email account and server for both her work-related and personal messages. The practice led to a storm of controversy that roiled her 2016 presidential bid and is widely viewed as contributing to her ultimate defeat by Donald Trump.

          In response to press questions during the campaign and in the sworn statement, Clinton said she kept the private account and server after taking over as secretary of state in 2009 as a matter of convenience and not to avoid FOIA or other disclosure requirements. The FBI investigated, interviewed Clinton and recommended against criminal charges, but it did find dozens of messages in her account that officials said contained highly classified information.

          However, Lamberth said in his ruling Monday that the FBI probe and representations by the State Department have not adequately put to rest questions about the episode and Clinton's deposition is needed to address those concerns.

          "To argue that the Court now has enough information to determine whether State conducted an adequate search is preposterous," wrote Lamberth, who has tangled with Clinton aides for decades in a series of cases.

          The judge, an appointee of President Ronald Reagan, said the fact that more Clinton emails continue to dribble out from the State Department raises questions about the thoroughness of the government's earlier actions to recover Clinton's messages.

          "Even years after the FBI investigation, the slow trickle of new emails has yet to be explained," Lamberth wrote. He blasted Clinton's prior answers given in response to another judge's order as "incomplete, unhelpful, or cursory, at best."

          Among the questions Lamberth said Clinton still needs to answer: "How did she arrive at her belief that her private server emails would be preserved by normal State Department processes for email retention? Who told her that�if anyone�and when? Did she realize State was giving 'no records' response to FOIA requests for her emails? If so, did she suspect that she had any obligation to disclose the existence of her private server to those at State handling the FOIA requests? ... And why did she think that using a private server to conduct State Department business was permissible under the law in the first place?"

          In addition to ordering Clinton's deposition, Lamberth said he'll require Clinton's former chief of staff Cheryl Mills to be deposed, although she was already questioned, in-person and under-oath by Judicial Watch about the issue in another FOIA case. The judge also approved a subpoena to Google for any Clinton emails it may possess.

          Lamberth said Clinton and Mills may be questioned specifically about their knowledge of records related to the Benghazi attack, but not about their response to the assault, which killed four Americans including the U.S. ambassador to Libya.

          Lawyers for Clinton and Mills did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the judge's order.


          Lmfao

          Judicial Watch are right wing hacks whose only aim is to smear ********s and is run by a clown who isn�t even a lawyer

          She should answer every question with �I don�t recall?and tell them to go **** themselves

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Tomjas View Post
            Lmfao

            Judicial Watch are right wing hacks whose only aim is to smear ********s and is run by a clown who isn�t even a lawyer

            She should answer every question with �I don�t recall?/b> and tell them to go **** themselves
            That is what her and her criminal ***-offender husband have been doing for the last thirty years.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by 1bad65 View Post
              The judge better have a good security detail and have his life insurance premiums paid up.
              Seriously

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by GhostofDempsey View Post
                That is what her and her criminal ***-offender husband have been doing for the last thirty years.
                Gotta love that superfan cheerleading.

                'It's ok for our players to refuse to answer questions under oath, but when the other team's players refuse to answer questions under oath they need to be imprisoned and/or impeached.'

                Go! Team! Go!

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by 1bad65 View Post
                  Gotta love that superfan cheerleading.

                  'It's ok for our players to refuse to answer questions under oath, but when the other team's players refuse to answer questions under oath they need to be imprisoned and/or impeached.'

                  Go! Team! Go!
                  She�s been investigated for years

                  She testified for 11 hours

                  Trump hand picked a guy to investigate her for 2 years recently and the conclusion was �we got nuthin?br />
                  Trump instructs his administration to ignore subpoenas and his lawyers are currently arguing that you can�t convict a sitting President in a **** case (that�s literally their �defence?

                  Waaaah

                  Bbbbbut her emails

                  Gtfoh kid

                  Comment


                    #10
                    She's a liar why are people on here defending her?




                    Incredible.




                    All because of Trump?


                    ****ing hell

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP