Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Floyd Mayweather vs. Diego Corrales: revisiting Pretty Boy's best outing

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Oregonian View Post
    ———
    Why did you leave out the sentence that followed what I wrote?
    Because I am not talking logic. I am talking facts. Shane Mosley was 38. In any forum he would be agewise and ringwise not in his prime by the time he fought Mayweather.

    There isn't too much to debate after that.

    Comment


      Originally posted by Oregonian View Post
      ———-
      Who did PAC beat at 140 that is worth talking about?
      Hatton had been KO’d by Floyd.
      So you agree that Floyd's whole 140 run was trash?

      What about "reigning champ" Gatti?

      Again, no dis to Gatti who is definition of warrior

      Comment


        Originally posted by Roadblock View Post

        lol, check your eyes and stay away from word games, 50% losing record is a 50% losing record, youre trying to put lipstick on a pig, you can be awkward and totally opposite to the normally taught boxing technique and be skilled in your awkwardness, its words, the thing is you tried to use Augustus as a best win fight in this thread, I dont think it was in the top 10 of Floyd wins , the guy was just awkward and not what boxers are trained to fight and Floyd was early in his career.

        If your not 90 you have no chance of me being a son lol.
        If I argue with a fool, they'll beat me on experience everytime. So you win...

        Comment


          Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post



          This is about Evander Holyfield, ;
          This thread is about Floyd vs Corrales.

          Some posters claim Corrales being drained with bronchitis had an adverse effect on the outcome.

          Your boy hypocrite Roadblock tried to say Corrales was not as drained as Oscar was vs. Manny. I say drained is drained. Corrales was undefeated, in his prime so i give Floyd full credit.

          What say you.

          Comment


            Originally posted by Pete_The_Man View Post
            Floyd's best performance, by far was against Gatti. This was not only his best performance but maybe one of the best performance from any fighter I've ever seen. Just total perfection

            Gatti was a C-rate fighter (in Floyd's own words) and battle fatigued. This was a one-sided mismatch, a typical cherry pick of a popular fighter on his way down.

            Comment


              Originally posted by djtmal View Post

              This thread is about Floyd vs Corrales.

              Some posters claim Corrales being drained with bronchitis had an adverse effect on the outcome.

              Your boy hypocrite Roadblock tried to say Corrales was not as drained as Oscar was vs. Manny. I say drained is drained. Corrales was undefeated, in his prime so i give Floyd full credit.

              What say you.
              Not interested in any of that.

              I’ve asked you a direct question in response to your post you made about Mosley. Are you going to answer it or continue to be the coward you are?

              Evander Holyfield was 41, 2-2-2 in his last 6, had 6 losses, even had to temporarily retire 7 years prior due to heart problems, yet you deem that "solid" and a "good win"?

              How do you reconcile that?

              Comment


                Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post

                Not interested in any of that.

                Ok well start a thread about Evander Holyfield and see what you get

                Comment


                  Originally posted by GhostofDempsey View Post

                  Gatti was a C-rate fighter (in Floyd's own words) and battle fatigued. This was a one-sided mismatch, a typical cherry pick of a popular fighter on his way down.
                  Oregano insists that Arturo was in his prime

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by djtmal View Post

                    Ok well start a thread about Evander Holyfield and see what you get
                    It’s in direct response to your point about Mosley, idiot.

                    Why are you avoiding the question? Be a man and address it.

                    Evander Holyfield was 41, 2-2-2 in his last 6, had 6 losses, even had to temporarily retire 7 years prior due to heart problems, yet you deem that "solid" and a "good win"?

                    How do you reconcile that?​
                    Oregonian Oregonian likes this.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post

                      It’s in direct response to your point about Mosley,;
                      Ok well start a thread about Holyfield and Mosley

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP